MAIN | News Archive | NORGE | What is the New World Order? | 9/11 | Free Energy | Article's and Documents | Video | Art! | Quote's |Link's | About Us!





Selected Articles by Philip Jones

The Corporatists The British State Media Whore Big Pharma Nexus (HPV Vaccine) Denmark, The Model Matrix For A Brave New World Mathematics: The Final Frontier in the Feminist war against boys The Danish Intifada (Enemy Without Distracts from Enemy Within) Once Were Vikings Happyland Britain is Sliding into Fascism Problem, Reaction, Solution versus The Silent Threat (or 1984 vs Brave New World) The Debt Trap! Microchipping The Met 'The Silence Of The lambs' (the true story) The End Of The Nation States Of Europe

________________________________________________________________________________________________






The Corporatists

16th October 2008

CORPORATISTS of left, right and centre show a marked hostility to allegations that the European Union is fundamentally fascist. This is perhaps not surprising since they combine in their belief in supranational government, collective solutions, corporatist economics, State intervention and what Tony Blair often termed the “Third Way” most of the characteristics of fascism. They must therefore seek to distance themselves from that discredited ideology. This is made easier if they can find an enemy to whom they can ascribe the values of “fascism” – they choose nationalists and those they term “the extreme right”. A fine example is the article by Professor Richard Overy in the London Evening Standard of 15th May 2002 who described “fascism” as an exclusively “right wing” movement. This false analysis was supported by pictures of the Frenchman Le Pen and the late Austrian politician Jorg Haider who are in principal nationalists, not fascists. The defining aspect of fascism is that it is neither right nor left nor centrist it is left and right and centrist as the support for fascism in the 1930s from Liberals like Lloyd George, Conservatives like Samuel Hoare and Socialists like Ramsay Macdonald, Lord Allen of Hurtwood and Arnold Toynbee clearly demonstrate. Fascism as represented by Hitler’s Germany, Mussolini’s Italy and the Vichy France collaborationists most certainly contained right wing elements, but had at least as many leftist factions. Mussolini was a socialist (he was the editor of the Italian Socialist Party’s newspaper). Hitler joined the German Labour Party and just as Tony Blair rid Britain in the 1990’s of its nationalisation policies so did Hitler in pre war Germany. Whereas the much vilified Le Pen joined the Resistance against Fascism, former French President Francois Mitterand, later the leader of the French Socialist Party was a hero of the Fascist Vichy regime. The wartime leader of British Fascism, Oswald Mosley was a Labour minister and became the leader of the British Union of Fascists. His wife Lady Diana Mosley (91) recently declared in a BBC interview her opposition to Le Pen and her support for the European Union! Fascism is on the move again in the form of the European Super-Statists who have mirrored in the EU project virtually every political and economic structure of 1940s Fascist Europe. Now, as it was back then, Czechoslovakia has been broken up. Yugoslavia has been carved up into petty `statelets, and currencies have been abolished.. Now as then, if the `Eurocrats` have their way, national parliaments are existing on borrowed time, to be maintained as useless shells. Now as then, the consistent anti-fascists in Europe - Russia and Yugoslavia - have been attacked and the fascist States - like Germany, Croatia (which managed to kill 400,000 Serbs, Jews and gypsies in the Jasenovac concentration camp) and Albania (which had its own Waffen SS division) – are on the (political) rise again - thanks to the power of a new German Europe. Professor Overy wrote totally erroneously that the Dutch “have no tradition of fascism”. In fact they were the only country to supply two full Waffen SS divisions for the German army. To describe Pim Fortuyn (murdered by a real fascist thug) as a fascist is preposterous. The homosexual Fortuyn had been attacked by a Muslim cleric (Bosnian and Albanian Muslims and many Arabs were faithful allies of Nazi Germany in the 1940s!) who said that a homosexual was “worse than a pig”. His justified response was hardly extreme. What the sadly late Haider and Le Pen are harnessing in their rather crude nationalism are the votes of those whose nations, democracies and jobs (5 – 6 million unemployed in Germany thanks to “preparation” for the Euro) have been destroyed. It is the, Brown’s, Merkel’s, Foch Rasmussen’s, and Sarkovzsky’s of this world who have recreated in this, the first decade of the 21st century a mirror image of the unemployment and desperation of the 1930s and 1940s in their supranational, unaccountable Euro-State. It was Monsieur Mitterrand who eroded and marginalised the authority of French democracy, not Le Pen. It was the European Union which brought pressure to bare on the Austrians who they could not vote for, namely the late and probably assassinated Jorg Haider. It was Blair and Chirac who bombed journalists in a Belgrade broadcasting station not Fortuyn and it is the European Union which threatens to remove trial by jury and habeas corpus, not euro sceptics. We are living in the age of the New Totalitarians. Almost all the so called `leaders` of the member states of the Europe Union are in thrall to the Corporatist Ideology of the architects of the New World Order. Their New European Order is little more than a stepping stone to the imposition of a Global tyranny based on the new `Third Way` or Communitarian ideology so beloved of the likes of Tony Blair et al. Communitarians want to create a post-modern, post-democratic feudal society run by a small number of rich and powerful people with everyone else working as peasants. In order to achieve their objectives they must destroy the middle class and the nation state. Isn’t this what they are doing across Europe. Wake up people, before it’s just too late. Philip Jones

________________________________________________________________________________________________






The British State Media Whore Big Pharma Nexus (HPV Vaccine)

3rd September 2008

On the front page of MSN UK this morning is the below article. Please note the happy faces of the three pretty young girls. I’ll wager my house that following the three shot Gardasil vaccine programme being advocated to inoculate against this `killer` virus, they won’t be smiling so heartily. This MSN article is typical of the mainstream media’s whorish slavery to the State/Pharma Nexus. There is barely a word of truth contained in it’s shoddy and poorly researched text, and yet the same rubbish or similar will be reproduced indiscriminately throughout the UK media, and believed without question by the vast majority who read it. Together with what can only be called a `Mass Marketing Campaign` for Gardasil and Merck, the Corporate Beast which produces it, it is difficult to see how one can even make a `dent` in the number of innocent young girls, whose lives will be forever affected by their parents decision to accept the Governments propaganda, and allow their daughters to receive the course of `jabs`. The nature of HPV (Human Papilloma Virus) and Gardasil has been expertly covered on rense.com previously by Dr Tim O’Shea (HPV The First Cancer Vaccine 10-6-7) and should be read in conjunction with this article. What I want to try and illustrate here is the stranglehold that the modern Corporate State has on it’s people, and how completely `plugged in` to it’s `Matrix` those people are. So `plugged in` to the point where many parents in the UK for example have totally abdicated responsibility for their children. Handing them over `lock stock and barrel` to the State machine. Before we proceed, this is what MSN has to say about HPV and the government programme associated with it: Cervical cancer jab roll-out starts "The Government is set to officially roll out its campaign to vaccinate young girls against a virus that causes cervical cancer. Social networking sites have already been targeted in a bid to encourage girls to have the jab which helps protect against human Papillomavirus (HPV). HPV is a sexually-transmitted infection that causes most cases of cervical cancer. Schools across the UK will start vaccinating pupils aged 12 and 13 (Year 8) from this week onwards, with about 300,000 girls receiving the jab in England alone. By July 2011, more than two million girls will have been offered the vaccine, including those up to the age of 18 as part of a catch-up programme. The Government's campaign for England, which is launched later, includes online, press, TV and radio advertising. A series of `road shows` will also be held in shopping centres across the country. The Government's main campaign will run this month and next, with some follow-up advertising in February to remind girls not to miss their third and final injection. Girls aged 17 and 18, who form part of the catch-up programme, will be the target of a different advertising campaign in October. The HPV vaccine protects against over 70% of the strains that cause cervical cancer, which accounts for around 1,000 deaths a year in the UK". What I will now do is debunk this piece of `hokum`, quoting real experts in the field who are in no doubt whatsoever about what the true purpose of this pernicious campaign is all about. The Lie : HPV is a sexually transmitted disease that causes most cases of Cervical Cancer. The HPV vaccine protects against over 70% of the strains that cause Cervical Cancer. There are over 100 strains of HPV, only 30 of which are theoretically linked to Cervical Cancer. HPV is present naturally in at least half the population without ever causing any disease whatsoever. HPV has never been proved as a pathogen for any disease. Merck, the marketers of HPV are making the ludicrous claim that the virus just happened along and attacked some healthy cells causing them to mutate and begin replicating out of control, and that is now happening on a mass scale, even though it has only recently been discovered, and that a vaccine can somehow neutralise that attack on normal cervix cells. We are in the realms here of `Junk Science`. Merck the said Pharmaceutical Industry giant originally claimed that “ There was a strong connection between HPV and cervical cancer“ . Somewhere along the way, that became “is the cause of” without any medical evidence to support this claim. This is clearly more about sales and marketing than science. The vaccine itself `Gardasil` has no competition in the field and consists of `virus like ` particles from four strains of HPV. With no clinical studies whatsoever, two of these `strains` are now being touted by Merck as being responsible for 70% of all cervical cancer cases, as so erroneously quoted in the above MSN text. The insert for Gardasil makes the unproven claim, “ HPV cause squamus cell, cervical cancer”. The market demographic Merck chose was pre teen 12 year old girls. But wait a minute, the average age of women who contract cervical cancer is 50 years, so why target 12 year olds. And even Merck themselves openly state that the efficacy of the vaccine is only 5 years, making it worthless by the time the subject needs the immunity, I.e. around her fiftieth birthday. Any claimed protection will have worn off long ago.. An established risk factor with cervical cancer is the number of sexual partners a woman has had. So who do you imagine will have had more, a 12 year old or a 50 year old. There is something seriously amiss with anyone who selects the former. So why are they so intent of giving it to 12 year olds, rather than what would be the correct target age if the vaccine did have any protective vale, namely women in their forties? Merck say it’s because the vaccine hasn’t been `safety proved` for women above 26 years of age. So as Dr O’Shea sardonically puts it `better give it to young girls then`. The number of vicious and painful side affects to this vaccine programme are little short of frightening, and include fever, nausea, pharyngitus, dizziness, gastroenteritis, appendicitis, bronco spasm and many more. In other words, real side effects in exchange for unproven immunity (Please see the Google Videos on the link provided below). There is even a strong probability that this under tested and unproven drug might be carcogenic in it’s own right. We are dealing here with a vaccine which claims to prevent cancer by imitating a pathogen which causes cancer. Merck say about this, “Gardasil has not been evaluated for carcogenicity or impairment to fertility”. The Reasons For The Lie : It is in the above statement that I believe the true motives behind this programme lie. To cause sterility and or cancer in young females thereby enabling a massive advance in the Illuminati’s depopulation agenda. It can be the only logical reason as to why governments in the service of the `hidden masters` would either encourage, coerce or mandate such an unsubstantiated vaccination regime and apply it to 12 year old girls when the risk group are women in their fifties, who for the most part are well past the age of conception. Furthermore, the Pharmaceuticals will once again make a fortune off the back of human suffering. What is so worrying is that with all the mainstream avenues of information secured, and with the huge financial recourses of `Big Pharma` to drive it along, and the seemingly limitless ability of the mass of the population to just comply, comply, comply, it is difficult to how this exercise in evil can be thwarted. Ref: Dr Tim O’Shea : HPV The First Cancer Vaccine www.rense.com 10.6.7 http://video.google.com/videosearch?q=gardasil&emb=0# http://www.heising.dk `Pharmageddon The Global War Against Women` by Kjeld Heising. Philip Jones

________________________________________________________________________________________________




Denmark, The Model Matrix For A Brave New World.

29th August 2008


"The perfect totalitarian state is one where the all powerful political bosses and their army of managers,
control a population of slaves who do not have to be coerced because they love their servitude".
Aldus Huxley, 'Brave New World'

In Huxley’s novel `Brave New World`, humanity lives in an apparently `Utopian` carefree, healthy and technologically advanced society `. Art, science and religion along with any vestiges of individuality and human emotion have all been corrupted and or erased in order to construct this Utopia. Warfare and poverty have been eliminated and everybody is permanently happy due to government conditioning and drugs. Also among the `eliminated` are `family, culture, literature and philosophy. Hedonism rules along with it’s `bed partners`, promiscuous sex and drug abuse, in the form of `Soma`. A powerful psychotropic drug, rationed by the government in order to allow citizens escape from painful memories through hallucinatory fantasy. Social stability is maintained via deliberately engineered and strictly enforced social stratification. Being a foreigner living in Denmark has had it’s disadvantages. But the opportunity to observe and even live in such a society has been priceless. It is fair to say that it was my arrival here back in the mid nineties which ruptured my own complacency, and began my journey of discovery. I have written previously at length about my own experiences in Denmark (See Brave New Denmark & Happyland on rense.com) so I will not indulge myself any further here. But what I must point out is that over the past eleven years, I have come to realise that there is something `Very Rotten In The State Of Denmark`. In the Matrix movie, the Morpheus character says to Neo, “The Matrix is a system Neo, and that system is our enemy. When you are inside it what do you see? The minds of the very people we are trying to save. But until we do, these people are part of that system and that makes them our enemies. You have to understand that most of these people are not ready to be unplugged. And many are so hopelessly dependent on the system, they will fight to defend it”. It is all but impossible to `unplug` Danes from their `Matrix`, because they cannot or will not see that it exists, even when one presents compelling evidence that it does.. This coupled with the fact that they have been indoctrinated from kindergarten into believing that it is the perfect social model, and the only path to a just and happy life. All but a few react with extreme indignation when any failings in this `flawless` Danish state are pointed out, or idiosyncrasies in the Danish character are spotlighted. The very inference that Denmark is a Totalitarian State along the lines of Huxley’s novel, which controls and micromanages their lives, causes a reflex `knee jerk` reaction which in it’s uniformity of response is startling. In effect, the whole Danish nation is locked into a state of mass denial and self delusion, or a condition known as `cognitive dissonance`. Simply put, this means to be in a state of inner conflict, when one’s belief system and experience do not corroborate each other. What then occurs as David Icke explained in a recent article is that ; "The effects of this inner disharmony have to be addressed either by accepting that one’s belief system is false, or by finding a way to justify the original belief. Most opt for the second recourse". The late Psychologist Leon Festninger, a student of Kurt Lewin (himself an inspiration of the `Tavistock Institute` ) wrote in the book, When Prophecy fails; "The individual believer must have social support. It is unlikely that one isolated believer could withstand the kind of disconfirming evidence we have specified. If, however, the believer is a member of a group of convinced persons who can support one another, we would expect the belief to be maintained and the believers to attempt to proselyte or to persuade non-members that the belief is correct." In other words, when one’s erroneous and discredited belief system, whether it be social, political or religious is shown to be evidently so, there is a clambering for safety in numbers. For the more there are to prevaricate and justify, `move the goal posts` if you will, then the greater the probability that the belief system, however discredited will remain the `received wisdom` of the masses. This describes Denmark exactly. Unlike other nations whose citizens in my experience, are able to perceive and recognise not only the positives in their societies, but the negatives also, Danes have been so inculcated with a sense of self righteous superiority, that they in `parrot fashion` continue to herald unquestioningly the wonderment of the Danish Social Model as being a pinnacle of human achievement. In a plethora of recent opinion polls, Denmark has been called the `happiest` place on earth. How can this be? How can a people so totally controlled claim such happiness? To answer the question: they don’t know any better. All the avenues of information reinforce this message daily. Other forms of social structure are always spoken about in the media and the state `education` system in negative terms. A walk along any Danish street will prove conclusively that this is not the happiest place on earth. As I have written previously, Danes are `content` in their servitude. There is no need for coercion or brute force on the part of government here. Each Dane knows and understands his/her place in the Matrix. So as factories begin to close, and jobs are lost or outsourced to the East. As food prices and utility bills rise far above those of other EU countries. As the already intolerable tax burden increases incrementally and relentlessly each year. As interest rates rise, and more and more Danes find themselves in extreme debt. The Danish people’s self delusion chip `kicks in` and they `pat` each other on the back and consolidate the national state of denial. In the Danish news this week, Lene Mobjerg wrote : “More than 200,000 Danes (out of a population of 5 million) and 28,000 Businesses are registered as debtors. 155, 000 new cases were filed during the first half of 2008 alone. The total debt owed by Danes is now 8.4 Billion Kroner ($1.6 Billion), and a large cross section of the population have severe economic issues to deal with. The largest debtor group are the 21-30 year olds, 7% of which are in serious financial trouble. In the 30-40 year demographic, nearly every registered debtor has upwards of 3 cases to his/her name”. Yet still, almost every Dane one speaks to refuses to accept that perhaps their Brave New World is not so `brave` and that there is `trouble in paradise`. Debt is a powerful force of enslavement. Danes as a people are in many ways in a state of `arrested adolescence`. The Children of the Sixties are as elsewhere now in the positions of power, and there is an almost ethereal feel about the place. One will find professionals in their fifties clothed in shorts and sandals. It’s almost as if `Woodstock` was only last week. But this seemingly Liberal Socialist veneer is only a mask for what is in actuality a ruthless Corporate Fascist State, which will tolerate no dissent whatsoever, and holds control, not by force of arms, or by the use of surveillance cameras as in the UK, but by the use of an indoctrinated mindset which imbues it’s citizens with a `There’s nothing you can do about it` mentality, combined with ever increasing use of prescribed anti depressants to those whose programming, because of their paltry existence in what is essentially an open `mind prison`, begins to break down. Then you have the `Gatekeepers` of the Danish `Matrix`. All themselves victims of the brain numbing propaganda hurled at them from childhood, perpetuated in schools and universities and reinforced daily by the state/corporate media. The parents, priests, teachers, police, soldiers, doctors, journalists and the `censors` who make sure that nothing is put into print, published or broadcast which will create confusion, doubt or dissention. Of course, just a little harmless and minor criticism is published in order to maintain the illusion of democracy and freedom. But nothing which will provoke real debate on any contentious subject.. Then there are the `neighbours` and the `community groups` ever watchful that no one raises his or her head above the ramparts, or breaks ranks, ceases to conform or displays any unnecessary signs of individuality. In fact and amazingly so, in Denmark and the other Scandinavian lands, there is a code of conduct used to enforce this `gatekeeper` mentality. It is known as the `Jantelav` and has it’s origins in the small villages and hamlets of Denmark back in the 18th and 19th centuries. The `code` was formulated by a Danish writer named `Aksel Sandemose` who included it in his novel, `A Fugitive Crosses His Tracks` in 1933. He based it on the closed and narrow minded behaviour he had witnessed as a child, and did not intend it to become what it has, a means by which a whole people’s view of themselves can become degraded. The Tennets of the `Code` are: 1. Don’t think you are anything. 2. Don’t think you are as good as us. 3. Don’t think you are smarter than us. 4. Don’t think yourself better than us. 5. Don’t think you know more than us. 6. Don’t think you are greater than us. 7. Don’t think you can do better than us. 8. Don’t laugh at us. 9. Don’t think that anyone cares about you. 10. Don’t think you can teach us anything. Now it has to be understood that this code describes entirely the attitude and mentality of the majority of Danish people. Was there ever a more perfect tool for controlling a society. Degrade their self image and belief in their purpose, their ability to excel and shine. Look at the last `tenet`. `Don’t think you can teach us anything`. For anyone who has come to live here with a craft or trade or other expert skill, that in a nutshell illustrates how impossible it is to introduce new ways and ideas into Denmark. Danes do not believe that anyone can teach them anything. Therein lies the contradiction. Arrogance on the one hand, perpetual self degradation on the other. I am convinced that Denmark is the Model Matrix for a `Brave New Europe` followed by a `Brave New World`, and it’s `software` is being exported internationally. Unless people of all races, religions, political persuasions, creeds and any other grouping are able to recognise it‘s programmes` and refrain from `plugging` themselves into it, slavery of a kind hitherto not experienced in all of human history will ensue on a Global scale. Experience has equally convinced me that any such `unplugging` is not going to happen here in Denmark, because the people don’t believe any problem exists or recognise it‘s credentials. This is after all the `perfect social model` with a population of people who are constantly told they have it better than anyone else, even though they are worthless and undeserving. And there you have the `sting`. People who believe themselves undeserving or unworthy have low expectations. They expect very little and are ever grateful to their benevolent masters for the `scraps` thrown them. As Goethe put it, "None are more hopelessly enslaved, than those who falsely believe they are free". Philip Jones

________________________________________________________________________________________________




Mathematics: The Final Frontier in the Feminist war against boys.

26th July 2008

Part 1. Last week, The Associated Press proudly reported that in the `largest` study of it's kind, where Mathematics is concerned, girls are now as `tough` as boys. This last bastion of male dominance in education has been breached. Janet Hyde, of the University of Wisconsin Madison, who led the study said, " Girls have now achieved gender parity on standardised Maths Tests". This relentless war on all fronts against the masculine has been raging for many decades now, not least in our schools and universities. I find myself asking "What is the `Femi` Brigade's` Endgame" ?. Is it to grow a penis on a baby girl and thus perfect the androgynous being they seem intent on creating by all means at their disposal ? Before I digress and go off on one of my `rants`, let's examine this business with maths and education more closely. As some might know by now, I am British, so I will continue this article based on what is happening in my own sad country. In August, when the GCSE results come out, it is highly likely that, once again, girls will have beaten the boys at the examination game. For years now, girls have been taking the lion’s share of success in public examinations. This year’s A and AS-level results were further evidence of the trend. Girls out-performed boys in almost every subject. They took nearly 47,000 more subjects than boys at A-level, and nearly 91,000 more at AS level. And in both exams, they achieved a higher proportion than boys of A grades in almost every subject. Of course, it is good news that girls are doing so well. But it is worrying that boys seem to be slipping further and further behind. For this trend isn’t confined to the high-fliers passing exams. At the bottom of the system, the drop-out rate among boys is causing serious concern. The reason is nothing other than the wholesale feminisation of the education system. In GCSEs, A-levels and - increasingly — degree courses too, coursework accounts for an ever greater proportion of the final marks. This in itself favours girls. Boys tend to like ’sudden death’ exams. They like taking risks, pitting their wits against the odds. Girls don’t. They prefer to work steadily and conscientiously without gambling against memory, the clock and questions from hell. Which is why at degree level boys have until now achieved more firsts and thirds than girls who tend to get safe, if dull, seconds. Nor is it surprising that girls are taking more exams than boys. For the curriculum has expanded in ways that suit girls rather than boys, with a proliferation of discursive, ’soft’ subjects like general studies, sociology or drama. The evidence suggests that boys and girls learn in different ways. Research has found that girls gain more satisfaction than boys from understanding the work they are doing. Boys are more ‘ego-related’, gaining more satisfaction from competing with each other. Nevertheless, education policy denies such differences and imposes instead an agenda of ‘equality’. For at least twenty years, feminist teachers have made a determined attempt to change a school system they held to be hostile to girls. The assumption was that since boys tended to opt for science, maths and technology and girls for languages, humanities and domestic science, this proved discrimination against girls. It never occurred to them that this pattern had evolved because each sex naturally gravitated towards these subjects. The view was that boys and girls were identical, and these differences therefore had to be corrected. The result was active discrimination against boys. As James Tooley comments in his book, the Miseducation of Women, girls began to be privileged over boys at school. Teachers gave priority to girls in classroom discussions, playground space and sporting fixtures. The ‘masculine content and orientation’ of textbooks, topics and tests was obliterated in favour of female references; teachers were forbidden to use ’sexist’ language; and male teachers’ bonding with boys through jokes or shared allusions to football had to be reprogrammed out of the system. During the 1980s, moreover, one project followed another to get girls into studying maths, science and technology. But it wasn’t sexism that was keeping girls away from such subjects - it was their choice. For time and again it has been shown that wherever they have the opportunity, boys gravitate naturally to mechanical sciences and girls to discursive or domestic subjects. Clearly, if any prejudice existed it would be right to address it. But this was not prejudice. It was rather that boys and girls behaved in different ways. This was never an issue in single sex schools. But once co-educational schools became the norm, the differences became striking - and feminism assumed that to be different meant inferiority and discrimination. This was not only wrong in itself. It was also disastrous for boys. For rather than men being masters of the universe as feminists contend, their sense of what they are is fragile. Unless their particular male characteristics are acknowledged and supported, they start sliding downhill and some go off the rails altogether. In school, boys find girls intrinsically threatening, a fact generally masked at the top of the ability range but in often violent evidence at the bottom. Girls mature earlier than boys, so unless boys are exceptionally able they tend to be outclassed by girls. And if they don’t dominate, they tend to give up or drop out. Because doing well in school involves no manual or physical activity but requires instead sitting quietly, reading and writing, the most vulnerable boys view learning as feminine and uncool. And being feminine is their deepest dread. This is because men’s sense of their masculinity is far more vulnerable than women’s sense of their femininity. Biology reminds girls what they are every month. Boys, by contrast, need to prove their identity and role, particularly among those with poor prospects and few confidence-boosting attributes. But rather than celebrating male characteristics, society tells boys at every turn that its values have turned female, and that if boys want any place in it they must do so too. Thus, male characteristics are derided. Warfare is said to be obscene. Authority is oppressive. Chivalry is a joke. Competition creates losers - taboo in education, where everyone must be a winner. Stoicism is despised; instead, tears must flow and hearts be worn on sleeves at all times. Men, however, define masculinity by being different from women. So this unisex culture has resulted in two things. More men are driven into stereotypical macho behaviour to prove their masculinity. And they simply withdraw from any sphere which becomes identified with women. Because girls’ success is now such a regular feature of the league table carnival, disadvantaged boys identify school failure with being macho and worthwhile. So more give up or drop out. It is not good for either sex to be placed at a disadvantage by the other. The aim must be to make opportunity as fair as possible. But that cannot be done by confusing equality of opportunity with identical experience, the fundamental error of our age. Boys and girls are different. It would be far better if they were educated in single-sex schools. Neither sex is well served by co-education. Neither sex benefits from coercion by the educational gender police. Many girls resent the pressure to do science subjects. Feminists fear that if girls don’t study science in the same number as boys, they won’t have the same career opportunities later on. But girls make different choices from boys because they have different impulses and interests and calculate their life prospects very differently. This is not an argument against girls studying engineering, or women becoming train drivers or particle physicists. It is rather that the system has become unfair and discriminatory against boys - the outcome of a philosophy that, despite its feminist credentials, does not allow girls the freedom to make their own choices, for fear that the dogma of unisex behaviour will be exposed once and for all as a big lie. In conclusion, I would suggest that this superficial levelling of the Mathematics `playing field` has long been considered one of the goals in the endless march towards that miserable, androgynous Utopia so longed for by the Friedens, Sontags, and Gurley Browns. I would also suggest that in reality, the Exam Results are in many cases more to do with politically motivated marking and preferential treatment, rather than any increase in the aptitude of girls in the field of Calculus, Geometry et al. Ref: 'All Must Have Prizes' by Melanie Phillips. Part 2. Recap : Last week, The `Associated Press` proudly reported that in the `largest` study of it's kind, a survey found that girls are now as `tough` as boys in the field of Mathematics. and that this, the supposed last bastion of male dominance in education had been breached. Janet Hyde, of the University of Wisconsin Madison, who led the study said, " Girls have now achieved gender parity on standardised Maths Tests". The relentless war on all fronts against the masculine has been raging for many decades now, not least in our schools and universities. It really doesn't take too much research and investigation in order to identify the whole movement as being one part of a cynically orchestrated `Psychological Operation` against all things male specifically, and humanity generally. This `Psy Op` although once highly covert has now become overtly obvious in it's aims, at least to those of us who have been able to see through it's facade of `righting wrongs`. So what are the goals of 21st Century Feminism in the arena of education ? It would be easier to state what it's goals are not. Equality in it's true sense is most certainly not a desired aim. If it were so, then the `ideologues` would be as concerned with the opportunities of boys as they claim to be with those of girls. Creating a stable environment for learning is clearly not a part of their agenda either, nor is the nurturing of young people, or the encouragement of any natural balance between young males and females during their formative years. As for facilitating the increased possibilities of girls opting for careers in Engineering, Science etc. enabled by any betterment of Mathematics standards, does anyone really `swallow` that one. I would suggest that the continued propagation of gender chaos is the primary reason that this `study` was commissioned, in the same way as all the others before it were. To `hit home` another nail in the coffin of masculinity, and further demoralise the human male psyche. Just as the `Feminazi's` have misled, manoeuvred and manipulated young women into believing that a career in the Military was a positive and viable option, now they are similarly luring girls into a career choice in the Science and Engineering fields for which not only are they mostly unsuited, but which few would even consider as being something they would naturally want to do. This relentless campaign is not about advancing the cause of women, nor some utopian ideal of equality. It is about destroying the `masculine` by the use of vicious anti male propaganda and vitriol, designed to deconstruct the masculine consciousness, especially in the fragile young , engendering feelings of confusion, inadequacy, failure and thereby emasculating boys entering their prime years. This in turn causes resentment and levels of implied misogyny, via pornography and other forms of disrespect towards the female, unknown, until very recently. For their part, young girls become confused as to what is expected of them. Their instinct and natures are constantly suppressed by feminist teachers agitating on behalf of a sinister ideology born (not conceived) half a century ago on the back of `Big Money` funding hateful and deranged `women` like Betty Freidan and Gloria Steinham. This latest `victory` in the seemingly ceaseless and overwhelmingly one sided `war of the sexes` is almost certainly not the last which will be publicly heralded as yet another vindication of Feminist theory. So now, we are told, girls cannot only `Kick Ass` as good as if not better than the boys. They can `add up` too. Does anyone else sense the condescension here ? Having discounted above what the `She Devils` agenda is not, let's identify what it is. Well, there can be no doubt that these `banshees` will stop at nothing short of total victory coupled with unconditional surrender. We are looking down the barrel of a `Fem Dom` artillery piece here. All around is chaos, and as the Freemasonic Motto goes, out of chaos comes order. Their order not ours. The goals of Feminism are the goals of the New World Order. Feminism is their `Fat Boy` and Education is the `Enola Gay` they have used to carry it. They say you can tell a tree by it's fruits. For goodness sake people, apply that little piece of wisdom to your lives and wake up. The enemies of good knew that in order to deconstruct western society, they would need to `steal our children` and fashion them in their image not ours. Now, the Feminist `Tree` is dropping it's fruit all around us., Apples of distrust, resentment and animosity. Acorns of divorce and fatherless children. Berries of resentment, hostility, animosity, misogyny, and Pears of depopulation and a decaying civilisation. These are the fruits of Feminism, and they are bitter indeed. Divide and Conquer has been a proven technique of control down the ages. The Feminist Agenda is the `sharpest blade` in the Illuminati's Arsenal, they have divided man from his mate, and can anyone truly deny that `we the people` have been conquered.` Philip Jones

________________________________________________________________________________________________




The Danish Intifada
(Enemy Without Distracts from Enemy Within)

Muslims the New Jews?

There can't be too many people who consider themselves to be politically `aware` who have not seen, read or heard something about the `Muhammad` Cartoons, published a couple of years ago by the Danish `Newspaper` Jyllandsposten. At the time, I was incredulous as to why a major national daily would commit such a provocative act, considering the tense relationship between the Muslim community and the host population here in Denmark. The presence of `taking a stand for free speech` certainly made me suspicious, as any non-Dane who has lived in Denmark will know; free speech is reserved for Danes only. Today, I fully understand the thinking behind those ridiculous caricatures; Provocation ! Muslims in Denmark are treated very differently to those living in the UK or Germany for example. Their attempts to build a Mosque have been thwarted time and again by the weight of Danish bureaucracy. In 2008, there is still no purpose built Islamic house of worship in Denmark, nor for that matter, any dedicated Muslim cemeteries either. Unlike in the UK, Muslims are kept out on the fringes of Danish society, and looked down upon simply for being different. I have many contacts within the local Islamic community and there is a sense of desperation. They feel socially and politically impotent. They are relegated to the lower end of the Job Market and are victims of a form of social injustice which is intensely xenophobic. The current wave of unrest was sparked by Police Officers in Copenhagen who treated an elderly Palestinian man in an aggressive and unjust manner. Now the question is, was the subsequent reaction by the Muslim youths in that community a spontaneous outburst of frustration, or something more sinister? Those who have taken an interest in the post 9/11 world will not be surprised when I say that these riots bear all the hallmarks of a `state sponsored` agent provocateur operation. In the aftermath of the `French Intifada` a year or so back, the OAS (French Intelligence) may have played a major role in stirring up racial and social hatreds. This is almost certainly the case here in Denmark, although I have no proof of this, the whole thing stinks. Recently, two Tunisians were arrested for supposed threats to the `cartoonists` responsible for the Muhammad drawings, and are I believe to be deported. Reportedly, a third who is thought to be a `Danish` citizen will have no charges brought. I wonder who he's working for ? The daily `ruse paper` Politiken has now come out in support of it's `sister` journal, Jyllandsposten supposedly in a show of solidarity for `Free Speech` in relation to the cartoons. Why has all this been rehashed now ? The world is drawing seemingly ever closer to a financial crash and the possibility of global conflict, the so called `Clash Of Civilizations`. What does this have to do with little Denmark ? Both Politiken and Jyllandsposten are `Bildeberger` connected. Anders Eldrup, the Chairman of the Danish company `Dong` has been a regular attendee for the past five years. His wife, Merete Eldrup is the managing director of both publications. A further `participant` Toger Seidenfaden just happens to be Executive Editor in Chief for Politiken. Is this all a coincidence ? Fleming Rose, the Editor of Jyllandsposten conducted a highly one sided and uncritical interview with Mr Daniel Pipes, a major Zionist propagandist and `Neo Con`, a la Perle and Wolfovitz. In typical `doublespeak`, this `Hawk` is a member of the US Institute Of Peace. Since Politiken `bought` the Jyllandsposten, that paper's drift towards the Zionist position has been marked. In a world where nothing appears to be what it is, the Muhammad Drawings and the current provocative coverage by both these editorials on the `Muslim` question in Denmark, should be viewed with suspicion. Weighted from the top with Neo Con Bildberger types, how likely is it that the Muslim side of the story will ever get a fair `airing` ? It is now my belief that the sole purpose of importing millions of Muslim people into Europe, was to destabilize the continent. I do not believe for one minute that the architects of the European Super state did not foresee the tensions which were bound to be caused when introducing a deeply alien culture into countries such as Denmark, which had always been highly homogeneous and somewhat isolated from the European mainstream. It has been done for a reason, and I fear we are beginning to see the true face of that reason. The State in whatever form has always justified it's existence and domineering of it's citizens by the ever present threat of an external foe. With the `Cold War` filed away in the History Books, and no would be aggressors anywhere to be seen, it was necessary to invent a different kind of threat. Enter the `War on terror`. A war without end as it were. Is it purely coincidental that the very multitude brought through the gates of the Western Citadels, is now identified as this new threat. What we are seeing in Denmark is an orchestrated means of instilling fear into the citizens of this small country. This will in turn give justification for the implementation of ever more restrictions on personal freedoms and the introduction of ever more Draconian legislation in order to `protect` the people. Why change a winning formula ? We have seen this time and again with Pearl Harbor, 9/11, 7/7 et al. And through the manipulation of the public consciousness, the media whores of the likes of the Jyllandsposten advance the cause of the EU Superstate, and thereafter the New World Order, and the population, now immune to common sense, free thought and the truth, will be led by the nose into the Totalitarian future planned for them. The Muslim boys running around the streets of Denmark are mere pawns in a deadly game. Some of them, creatures of the Intelligence services will know this, and profit greedily from it. Most will not, and have no idea that their own frustration and visible violence will be used to eventually crush them. The Muslims are ironically being set up as the `New Jews` of Europe. An archetypal scapegoat. It seems that history is about to repeat itself once again Philip Jones

________________________________________________________________________________________________




Once Were Vikings

In Defence of Danish Manhood

18th July 2008

I remember as a small boy being completely enthralled by the Hollywood Movie, `The Vikings` starring Kirk Douglas, Tony Curtis and the beautiful Janet Leigh. I must have been around seven years old at the time I first viewed this epic, and in many ways, it stimulated in me a life long interest in history generally and that of Northern Europe particularly. Many books have been written about the `terrible` and fierce men of the north; The `Norsemen` or more famously, `The Vikings`. Such books are generally filled with descriptions of immensely tall, strong and brutal warriors with names like `Harald Bluetooth, Sveyn Forkbeard, Canute the Great, and Brodir. I think it fair to say that these men were not projecting their masculinity due to any deeply felt feelings of insecurity about their manhood. By the time I moved to Denmark back in 1995, I had been thoroughly immersed in and fascinated by Viking History, myths and legends for the greater part of thirty years. It is fair to say that I was looking forward to seeing the homeland of my childhood heroes for myself. and I was looking forward to actually meeting the descendants of the Vikings. Real men, the sons of warriors. Now before I continue, I must make it clear that what comes next is not intended as a degradation of Danish men at all . Quite the contrary. But it must also be said that what I found upon arriving in Denmark was not quite what I had expected. Within a short space of time, I was asking the question; “Where were the sons of Odin, the Berserker's, the Wolves of the North Sea”? With some exceptions, it is true to say that many of the Danish men I have come into contact with these past thirteen or so years, have borne very little resemblance to those warriors described in the `tales of old`. It's not that Danish men appear physically weak or in any way lesser men than anywhere else. In fact, Danish men, like all Scandinavian males, are generally taller, and more muscular than say Slavs, Scots, Welsh and Irish men for example. No, the difference was in their demeanour. My impression was then and still is that Danish men have been deliberately cowed down, and emasculated by a State Apparatus seeking absolute authority over every minute detail of a Danes life. There can be no arguing that here in Denmark, as it would seem with the rest of Scandinavia, the socially strategic `High ground` has been well and truly captured by the `Feminists` with the complicity of successive sitting governments. Only a few days ago, I was speaking with a young Tunisian woman studying here as an exchange student, and she remarked to me that it appeared to her that it was the women who `ruled the roost` in Denmark, and she motioned with her hands depicting how one leads a Bull by the Nose. Exactly the same observations were made by another young woman staying here who comes from Moldavia. She is lodging with a Danish family locally and has been astounded at how dominant the wife is, and how compliant the husband is. It should be noted that the husband in question is physically very strong, intelligent and articulate, so why the subservience at home? Danish men have had their self confidence very badly bruised by incessant `pro femi` propaganda, which attacks them on all fronts simultaneously. Having lived here for many years now, I must say that I can only concur with the comments made by the two young women mentioned above, and furthermore, this `Feminist` dominance, at least on the surface, is across the board and throughout all the public institutions. It seems to me that in order to actually get to deal with another man these days, one has to set one's sets very high up the Corporate or Municipal ladder. So how were the progeny of `The Vikings` so reduced in stature? Scandinavia is the home of Social Democracy, which in reality is nothing more than `Cutural Marxism`. The whole social ethos of these Northern lands is Marxist to the bone. But there is more to this than first meets the eye. In fact, Danish society can appear to be something of a paradox, with it's flourishing consumerism (somewhat curtailed of late by the world economic downturn) and unashamed materialism on the one hand, neatly wed to a deeply embedded Marxist Socialist spirit on the other. Yet in reality, there is no paradox.. What do you get when a Socialist State gets in bed with Monopoly Capitalist Corporatism ? You get as Mussolini is once quoted as describing, `Corporatism` or rather ``Fascism`. That's right, I'm saying that Denmark is a Fascist State. A place whereby even the most minute details of a persons life are regulated and micromanaged by a vast State Bureaucracy. A Totalitarian Regime, elected by an deliberately uninformed populace. Back in the 1960's, `equality of the sexes` was adopted as policy by the Social Democrats and placed on the school curriculum. At an early age, conventional ideas of male and female roles were broken down. Boys were taught to sew, girls to do woodwork. So called equality was taken to it's logical conclusion. There was no longer any reason why a father could not stay at home and care for the children whilst the mother went out to work. One of the purposes in predisposing women to work was clearly economic, but I suggest that this is only one `cog in the wheel`. Men don't like being told what to do. Women are far easier to coerce and manipulate. The greatest obstruction to Totalitarianism is masculinity. The Danish State like all the other Dictatorships masquerading as democracies, hand in hand with Feminist ideologues, has conspired to emasculate the Danish male to the point where any prospect of some long lost `Viking` mentality rearing it's head in defiance, of the suffocating levels of control exercised by the State here would be unthinkable. Instead, as is the case in many other western lands, Danish men console themselves with Sports, DIY and other non idealogical, apolitical diversions, leaving such things very often to what arguably passes for the female here. These `hobbies` are the only outlet left for men to express their masculinity, and the Danes do so with gusto. The Danish National Football (Soccer for North American readers) consistently outperforms sides from much larger countries, and Danish Boxers, although not truly World Class, are to be found around and about every weight division of the various Boxing Authorities. It is similarly the case with other sports. Gender Role confusion is rampant, particularly in young men and teenage boys. My own Step Son has confided in me many times that he just doesn't understand what girls expect of him. He tells me that they are impossibly argumentative, confrontational, show no respect for the masculine at all. He says that he would like to meet a nice girl and settle down, but he cannot imagine ever finding one. Danish girls play football, chew gum, shout and behave badly in public, dress slovenly, have bad attitudes and are generally not a good advertisement for the feminine at all. I myself, as a former `Guest Lecturer` have been dumbfounded at the open bias towards girls and young women in the schools and universities here. If anyone reading this doubts my accuracy, please check out the website of any Danish School or University. The preponderance of young women featured in the photographs on these web pages defies any such argument to the contrary. When a young male student is depicted, it is usually some unfortunately effeminate `girly boy`, with his girly hair and girly clothes complete with those hideous girly shoulder bags. The whole system here is set up to belittle and ridicule the masculine. How many nauseating times have I heard this phrase, “ Macho man are really frightened little boys”. How I hate that one, and challenge any `woman` to say that to my face. Anyone who has read my previous articles will be aware that my opinion of Danish womanhood is not very positive. There are many pretty young girls to be found here, albeit of the invariably `Jeans and T Shirt` variety. But by the time they reach thirty, they will have almost certainly `morphed` into what I can only term a `non male`. Neither visually male or female. This condition worsens with age and becomes chronic by the time they reach fifty. Once again, if anyone doubts what I am writing, please visit any `Supermarket` in Denmark for confirmation. What I miss is seeing a `classy` well dressed mature woman`. Excepting my dear wife, it would appear such a thing does not exist amongst the `Non Royals` here, and if it does, seems unable to survive for very long. In conclusion, what has been done to Danish men is in many ways what is being done to men all across the world, only here, the condition is extreme. Nothing about the masculine is celebrated. Everything about the `Feminist` (note, I said feminist, not feminine) is automatically taken as being the accepted `Truth` and symbolically carved in stone. One last point, I was driving back from the local village a month or so ago when I saw some teen aged boys and girls playing football together. Not wishing to appear in any way strange, I parked up some distance away and watched, and saw that almost every time there was a disputed call, the referee (a non male) awarded the decision to the girls. Every time the boys scored, it was disallowed, every time a girl was tackled, she fell to the floor and was awarded a penalty. One could see the heads of the boys dropping, their enthusiasm and will to win being sucked from them, resigned to the hopelessness of their situation. What could they do, everything was against them. Of course, the girls won and jumped around , shouting and screaming, making fun of the opposing team. It was all rather sad, and in many ways, encapsulated what has become of the masculine in Danish Society. Every now and then though, one gets a glimpse of what once was, when Danish men were the terror of all `Christendom`, like when recently, the excellent Danish Boxer Mikkail Kessler won the WBA Super Middleweight Belt. In the Danish man, there is a sleeping warrior, waiting for his time to come. The only problem is, that if he waits too much longer, the Aspartame, Fluoride, 21 vaccines per child, Tetra Waves and all the other insidious weapons being used against him and the rest of humanity by the New World Order will have dumbed him down to such a level, that resistance will be impossible. So, `Sons of Thor` it's now or never. Take back what's yours by right of your ancestors blood and toil, and stop giving in. Turn off the TV, leave the DIY alone and open your eyes to what is being done to you and yours by a government who's only reason for being is to control you, and drip by sodden drip, take away all the fruits of your labour. Philip Jones

________________________________________________________________________________________________




'Happyland'

3rd July 2008

“The most dangerous revolutions are not those which tear everything down, and cause the streets to run with blood, but those which leave everything standing, while cunningly emptying it of any significance”. The Danish philosopher `Kierkegaard`. London's Evening Standard Edition for 1st July 2008 reported in an article entitled `Happyland` that a recent opinion poll revealed that of all the peoples of the world, Danes were the happiest. This the poll stated was due to the country's peaceful atmosphere, Democracy and social equality. I have lived in Denmark for the better part of the last thirteen years, and yes, compared to the larger more industrialised nations, Denmark is indeed peaceful, and in the future, if current trends persist, will become ever more so as the population plummets due to the below replacement birthrate and a national antipathy towards immigration. The Danish Democratic ideal is as it is elsewhere today, a ruse to calm the masses into thinking they actually have a voice, when the truth is very different. When people believe themselves `free`, they do not rebel, so all remains `peaceful`. As for `Social Equality`, some Danes are more equal than others, and as it is everywhere else, a consulting surgeon for example, and a manual labourer are not regarded or treated as equals by anyone I have met here. In recent times, there have been several such surveys conducted, all of which asserted that Denmark is the happiest place on the planet. The question is of course, why do we need to keep being told this? What is the purpose, and is there an agenda, as for the life of me, I cannot see Danes as being a happy people at all. It is my thesis following much research and investigation into this phenomena that Denmark is, and has been for years, a `Test Zone` for the European Union in particular and the emerging New World Order in general. And that the constant reinforcing of this Danish `fairy tale` in the international media is contrived to convince the peoples of the EU firstly, and the rest of the world thereafter, that the subtle mental prison that is Denmark, is highly desirable and a model that all should strive for. To state that Danes are the happiest people on earth is abject nonsense and I will attempt in this essay to debunk this Illuminati manipulated version of the truth once and for all. The Danish concept of happiness is quite different to that of say the USA, or any of the other English speaking lands. Danish happiness is tied up entirely in one word; `Tryghed` or safety/security. Now these elements might be necessary for a happy life, but they do not constitute happiness in themselves. A long term prisoner might feel `safe and secure`, but how many would proclaim happiness. The most common English dictionary definition of happiness is; “ A state of pleasure, joy, exhilaration, bliss, contentment, delight, enjoyment, satisfaction”. Of the above, I can only say that I have witnessed in the Dane a sense of resigned contentment and satisfaction with his or her lot. The other elements are highly conspicuous by their absence. It should be noted that Danes are generally undemanding and compliant by nature and so long as the Status Quo is maintained, they shuffle about their lives innocuously enough So what is this all about then? It's about constructing an environment where people become servile and acquiescent. Grateful for the `scraps` handed down to them by their benevolent master, the State. As Aldous Huxley wrote in Brave New World, “The perfect Totalitarian State is one where the political bosses, and their army of managers, control a population of slaves, who do not have to be coerced, because they love their servitude”. This describes Denmark and the Danes perfectly. As I have stated above, my contention is that Denmark and the Danes along with Sweden (please read `The New Totalitarians by Roland Huntford) have been used as a model for the EU Superstate. A laboratory experiment if you like, in order to test and try out those systems to be introduced on a pan continental scale sometime in the near future. If one wanted to conduct such an experiment, certain conditions would be desirable. Like any worthwhile research site, a level of isolation and insulation is essential. The number of subject specimens needs to be large and varied enough to allow the project validity, but not so large that the possibility of losing control becomes a factor. The subject specimens themselves must have character traits found commonly from within and outside the `target zone`, yet be malleable enough to allow for sudden and unexpected changes to the programme, and as an essential, lacking completely any tendency to rebelliousness and non conformity. Both Denmark and Sweden certainly fulfil the criteria above and could be said to fall within the remit of the above described possible scenario. Both are located at the Northern Tip of Europe. Both have a tradition of neutrality and isolationism. Both have small and traditionally compliant populations due to many decades of imposed socialist dogma, and a history of bureaucratic government. Both have for centuries been regarded as being on the very fringe of European Culture and therefore generally of little interest to the `mainstream of European life. But most perfectly, and up until very recently, both have been, and to a large extent still are, highly homogeneous. To induce a people into believing the level of national and cultural superiority displayed by Danes is an elementary device to secure compliance with the state and hinder criticism. When covering news stories from abroad, the Danish media in general and television in particular appear more intent on highlighting the `superior` nature of the Danish social model, than reporting the news accurately and giving a fair and balanced picture of life in other lands. The negatives of the other country are starkly highlighted and any positives usually ignored. Weighted comparisons are drawn to the advantages of living in Denmark. Danes are not only repeatedly told that they enjoy one of the highest standards of living on earth, and the best welfare system, but that they and all things Danish are superior. For the outsider, the complexity of this system of self adulation and the crucial role played in it by the media and state education system can be difficult to grasp. To instil this sense of superiority and security, the Danish State Propaganda Machine must continually convey these messages about itself 1.That it is in every respect functioning successfully. 2.That is superior in all aspects. 3.That the people and the state are indivisible. 4.That the state apparatus is the democratically elected guardian of the Danish way of life. Leonard Schapiro wrote ; “The true object of propaganda is neither to convince nor persuade, but to produce a uniform pattern of public utterance in which the first trace of unorthodox thought reveals itself as a jarring dissonance”. In Denmark, the role of the `elected` politicians, although in no way resembling anything of a truly democratic nature is still very significant. As in the other EU countries, their function is to act as `front men`, presenting the system to the Danish people as being unchanged. Conveying the message that it is they, the elected representatives, who still make the rules and hold the power given to them `democratically` by the voters. Perpetuating the illusion that Denmark is somehow immune to the turbulences of the outside world and that the Danish State will provide and protect. The constant use of `Flag Flying` plays a huge role in this, aiding the illusion of national independence and sovereignty. The truth is of course that Danish Folketing like other national parliaments in Europe is increasingly subservient to Brussels. Danes have been so conditioned to believe what they are told by officialdom, that they have become unquestioning and uninterested dupes in the European Scheme to create a Federal Superstate with Fascist credentials. There are many examples of how my own country the UK, has implemented legislation from Brussels causing huge social change, the model for which has been present and tested in Denmark for years. I would hazard a guess that the same is true for many of the other member states. Recently, the Irish people voted against adopting the EU Reform Treaty, understanding that ratification would mean the loss of sovereignty over a myriad of important issues. In Denmark, the Prime Minister stated (without the slightest hint of a smirk on his face) that Denmark would ratify the `Treaty` by parliamentary means as it involved no loss of sovereignty. This was clearly a bare faced lie, and yet public debate and criticism was and remains almost non existent. When I first arrived here all those years ago, I was frequently told that Denmark `exports` knowledge, not products. Now I understand what that `knowledge` is. Denmark has shown the way to the rest of Europe, and perhaps the world on how to construct a subtly dictatorial state, which without resorting to overt oppression or force, can easily micromanage almost every aspect of a persons life from cradle to grave, instil in people a national condition of dependency on the State, get citizens without coercion, to spy on their neighbours, regulate and police each other, and identify with the state, rather than with family and community. The experiment I would suggest has been a resounding success. Sadly now for the whole of Europe, it's results and findings are being implemented throughout the EU bloc, much to the dismay of those unaccustomed to having their lives, and those of their children dictated to by a sinister bureaucratic behemoth. If Denmark is filled with all these happy folk, why is it that this Socialist Utopia has one of the highest suicide rates in the world, especially amongst the youth, with a rapidly growing number of young people of school age being prescribed anti depressant drugs, massive levels of alcoholism, a growing disaffection between the genders, resulting in low marriage levels, a below replacement birth rate, and a alienation and polarisation between the generations. Is this really a description of `Happy land`? So, are Danes happy? They have certainly been conditioned to believe they are. Are they secure? The illusion that they are remains, but cracks in the `dam` are appearing. For the present, until the `experiment` is concluded, and so long as they continue to acquiesce to the relentless demands for an ever greater share of their personal wealth, Danes will continue to worship their holiest of Holies `Tryghed` and believe themselves `cared for` by their `benefactor and protector`, the Danish State . In conclusion, the Danish variant of happiness is simply not the same as one would find in, for example, Australia or the USA . Like a Canary in a cage, provided all the essentials of survival are present, with the illusion of credit created affluence intact, the Dane will proclaim his `happiness`. Tragically, he/she is not qualified to answer the question as he/she simply doesn't know what happiness is. Philip Jones Postscript: Yesterday evening, I was walking my dogs in a small wooded area near to my home when I met young couple innocently enjoying a Mid Summers evening together. I knew immediately that they were not Danes, as they were smiling and warmly greeted me, even acknowledging my dogs, and this is not the kind of behaviour I have come to expect from the natives, who usually give a brief, stoic nod of the head, ignore the dogs and hurry on their way, in case I might engage them in conversation. Anyway, it turns out that the young couple were from the Ukraine. We stood and chatted for a while, and as it always does when one meets other Non Danes in Denmark, the question of how each of us likes or dislikes living in the country, and how we perceive the natives, arose. We agreed that Danes were `decent enough, but a little stern, stoic, not over friendly, often unwelcoming, miserable when sober, and difficult to come in contact with on a personal level` I have had many similar conversations with foreigners from all over the world who were/are resident here. It should be added at this stage that of course, one does find helpful and friendly Danes as one does everywhere. But it's not the individual character I am talking about here, it is the national character, and it is my experience that a happy, friendly, open Dane is the exception, rather than the rule. Coming soon: Has Denmark been a `Test Zone` for Codex Alimentarius?

________________________________________________________________________________________________




Britain is Sliding into Fascism

January 16, 2008

Britain is sliding inexorably into Fascism. Of this there can be no doubt. The `land of my father's`, seems today like a foreign country to me . The once friendly `Bobby on the beat` is no more to be seen. In his place are legions of surveillance cameras, many fitted with loudspeakers to terrorize and shame pedestrians and shoppers publicly into abject conformity. Around the `Mother Of Parliaments`, an area of one square kilometre has been declared a `no protest zone`. This would have been unthinkable only a few years ago. Is this really the country of Byron, Shakespeare, Bronte and Charles Dickens ? I was a teenager in South Wales back in the seventies, , when `Coal was King` and Steel it's consort. All our men folk were either Miners or Steelworkers. The family unit was very tight, and communities helped each in good times and bad. The only `surveillance` was Sgt. Evans, our local Cop. Thirty eight years on, I still remember him, as being somehow always there, and usually friendly and helpful, yet with an air of authority and decency sadly lacking in today's Officers. That country is gone `with the wind` one might say. In it's place is a far more ominous, impersonal `State` where the `regime` has become all powerful and intrusive. I was a Police Officer for fifteen years. I carried no Gun, no Taser, no Pepper Spray and wore no Body Armour. My only protection was a short piece of wood, and my wits. Britain's Police `Service` has become a politicized paramilitary arm of of the state. They can `gun down` innocent people (as in John Menezes), shoot them eight times in the head at point blank range and go unpunished. Unmanned `Drones` fly over the London skies with intrusive camera equipment and microwave weapons on board. Peaceful protesters are battered with `nightsticks`, and then arrested for their trouble. The ancient right of trial by jury is under constant attack, egged on by the `Code Napoleonists` in Brussels.. For most of my career , I watched successive governments do nothing as crime and disorder escalated out of control. Paedophiles, were allowed (perhaps encouraged) to prowl our land with apparent impunity and State sponsored anonymity. Traffic chaos, road rage, the break down of the family, `feral` children, football hooliganism. All out of control. Why did government stand idly by and pay only lip service to `law and order`. The Masonic Motto is , "Out of Chaos comes order". In other words, create the problem incite the reaction, then offer your solution. One of Blair's solutions was the `Civil Contingencies Act of 2004. This is in spirit a direct descendent of the Nazi Enabling Act of 1936, and a first cousin to the `US Patriot Act`. In effect, it gives `the government` the power to declare a `state of emergency` and impose Martial Law. Of course, the Al Qaeda bogeyman has played it's part further justifying this `necessary restriction of liberties`. It was only the first of other tyrannical statutes to be introduced subsequently in order `To protect the people`. Surveillance Cameras, Drones in the sky, Bio ID Cards, `Tooled Up` Police on the Streets, no protest zones, free speech zones, intrusive and invasive Council Tax Inspectors. It is hard to fathom how this could have happened to that country I loved so much in only half a lifetime. It was Huey long who said, "When Fascism comes to America, it will come in the name of Anti Fascism". Well Fascism came to Britain in 1997 in the guise of a liberal left wing government, led by a `liberal``child of the sixties` Mr `Phoney` Blair. My late father fought with Montgomery during WWII. He was a damaged man when he came home, and never realised his own potential. That can be said of a generation of British men who went to war to `fight for freedom`. What a betrayal of millions of lives. I moved to live in Denmark in 1996, one year prior to the New Labour`coup d'etat` but in truth, in my heart, I never left Britain, it left me and all my generation. Blair's `Cool Britania` was and is something very different. A nation of TV addicts, sports crazy's and hedonists, mixed into a cocktail with multiculturalism, anti social behaviour and ruthlessness. This essay could be entitled `Problem Reaction Solution versus The Hidden Threat`. Here in Denmark, things are done differently. It is my thesis that the Utopian Danish Social State is actually something other from that which on face value at least, it appears to be. Denmark is not about Welfare, nor has it ever been. Welfare was the `Carrot` and now `the Stick` is being used to beat the Danish people down economically, having installed over five decades, deep within their national character, a complete dependency on the State apparatus. The nearest example to this is Huxley's nightmare novel, `Brave New World`. Denmark' apparent prosperity, comprehensive social welfare, and corporate efficiency, are I would suggest products not of enlightenment, but of a profound insecurity and uniformity in the Danish character. The political system here, has not only successfully undermined the role of the Danish Parliament and substituted a vast bureaucracy that has contrived a firm pact between labour and the establishment, it has also presided over a process by which the Dane has become the obedient and malleable item in a `town planners` or sociologist's dream. A friend, the Danish Political Commentator Kjeld Heising (www.heising.dk) wrote recently on the Danish condition, "Danes live within narrow margins. Inside these margins, we can live normally, as part of the labour force, as consumers and as members of a `thought community`. Outside of this is a steep slope to poverty, social isolation and deroute. The slope is vertical, there are no `in betweens`. Constants heaps of legislation ensure that no Dane understands his conditions and therefore no Dane can operate in them. Consequently, the middle class Dane lives under a constant threat of bills, fines, penalties, duties, charges, fees, loss of income and esteem. These `narrow margins` ensure that even minor sanctions can tip the scales. That's why he can be controlled with a smile, a raised finger and a subtle reminder of small sanctions. A `Silent Threat`. For the moment, there seems no reason for the more obvious, draconnian and overt measures here in Denmark that we see being put in place across the North Sea. The `Silent threat` is enough for the present. The incessant economic turning of the screw is doing its job well enough for now. But, I just wonder how many turns are left before Danes wake up and `smell the coffee` or should I say `Kaffe`. PS. The book `The New Totalitarians` by Roland Huntford written in the 1970's was an ominously correct analysis of the Swedish Social Model. Denmark, Sweden, potato, potaato. It's well worth a read. Philip Jones

________________________________________________________________________________________________




Problem, Reaction, Solution versus The Silent Threat
(or 1984 vs Brave New World).

The United kingdom is sliding inexorably into Fascism. Of this there can be no doubt. The `land of my father's` seems today in many ways like a foreign country to me . The once friendly and helpful `Bobby on the beat` is no more to be seen. In his place are legions of surveillance cameras (6,000,000 to date with thousands more planned), many fitted with loudspeakers to terrorize and shame pedestrians and shoppers publicly into abject conformity. Around the `Mother Of Parliaments`, an area of one square kilometre has been declared a `no protest zone`. This would have been unthinkable only a few years ago. Barely a road is devoid of the hated `gatso` speed cameras. Council Tax Inspectors can now demand entry into houses in order to `assess` the `taxable` value of homes, and take photographs of personal belongings. The Police are turning into a military arm of the state. They can `gun down` innocent people (as in John Menezes), shoot them eight times in the head at point blank range and go unpunished. Unmanned `Drones` fly over the London skies with intrusive camera equipment and microwave weapons on board. Peaceful protesters are battered with `nightsticks`, and then arrested for their trouble. The ancient right of trial by jury is under constant attack, egged on by the `Code Napoleonists` in Brussels.. Is this really the country of Byron, Shakespeare, Bronte and Charles Dickens ? Then there is the `Biometric ID Card`, a thing nobody wants, but they're going to have to have it whether they like it or not, and pay for it, and carry it, or suffer the consequences (such is the 21st century variant of Democracy). This card comes complete with a microchip, which will carry all a person's personal details and financial information. Worse still, it will be connected to a hugely intrusive national database. It will become impossible to function in the UK without it. But it is doomed to failure, and so it is meant to be. People will lose them, and horror stories will abound about how personal details and identities have been stolen. This will result in the public demanding that something be done about it, and that something will be the `under the skin microchip`. The propaganda machine will crank itself into overdrive, and the `big sell` will be on. I can see the Public `Infomercial` now, probably with some attractive female TV personality, who is totally `on board` presenting the lie on national prime time. 'Your details will be completely safe. No more worrying about lost cards, or even money, because all your bank details will be on the chip. In fact, cash will become a thing of the past. There won't be any need of it. Then there's the children. Never worry again about where little Johnny is. You can track him yourself, via his chip. It's a great idea and all for the best'. Alright then I can hear all the relieved parents and forgetful types saying. But there's a catch. The Microchip is not so innocent. It can be programmed to resonate at a frequency identical to human electromagnetic brainwaves. In other words, it can affect your thoughts and feelings. Yes, that's right, you'll become a robot. They can programme you. There will also be nowhere to hide, ever, because you can be tracked via GPS. Then there is the other matter. At present, if your credit card won't function or is refused, you can always use cash. But when cash is gone, what are you going to do then ? They can switch you off, well, the `Chip` anyway, and you will become in a micro second `persona non grata`. Unable to purchase or sell, or eat. The ultimate vehicle for total human control. Your life in their hands. In the Bible book of Revelations it says , ' And it puts under compulsion all persons, the small and the great, the rich and the poor, the free and the slaves, and they should give these a mark in their right hand, or upon their forehead, and that nobody might be able to buy or sell, except a person having the mark, the name of the beast or the number of it's name. Let the one having intelligence calculate the number of the beast, for its is a man's number and it's number is 666.' In other words, no chip, no food. No prizes for guessing the name of the beast. It's the `New World Order` and it's coming to a town near you very soon. Now, all you Danish readers might be thinking, well yes alright, the UK's become a nightmare, but what's all this got to do with us ? Well the thing is, Denmark is a member State of the EU. In fact, let's get real. The nation states of Europe are a hop, skip and a jump away from Federalising. It could happen as soon as 2010, but my guess is 2012. Our `governments` no longer govern. They do as they are told by Brussels, and that's not a point of viable debate. It's a `fait acompli`. So where goes the UK today, so follows Denmark and the rest tomorrow, and Vice Versa. There are two modern variants of the totalitarian model. One is the George Orwell `1984` boot on your face variety. The other the far more insidious Aldous Huxley. `Brave New World` variant. There can be little argument that the UK is being used as a `Test case` for totalitarianism using the former. This is necessary as Brits `kick up a stink` when things don't go their way. So it's the `jackboot` for them, along with the Taser stun gun, pepper spray, the Microwave Pulse Anti Personal Weapon` (MPAPW) and of course, that old favourite, the Nightstick. Here in Denmark, things are different. It is my thesis that the Utopian Danish Social State is actually something very different from that which on face value at least, it appears to be. It is not about Welfare, nor has it ever been. Welfare was the `Carrot` and now `the Stick` is being used to beat the Danish people down economically, having installed over five decades, deep within the national character, a complete dependency on the State apparatus. As I have said previously, the nearest example to this is Huxley's nightmare novel, `Brave New World`. Denmark' prosperity, comprehensive social welfare, relative neutrality (until recently) and corporate efficiency, are I would suggest products not of enlightenment, but of a profound insecurity and uniformity in the Danish character. The Social Democratic party, at least initially not only successfully undermined the role of the Danish Parliament and substituted a vast bureaucracy that has contrived a firm pact between labour and the establishment, it has also presided over a process by which the Dane has become the obedient and malleable item in a `town planners` or sociologist's dream. For the better part of my adult life, I have watched as successive British `Governments` have allowed violence and criminality to proliferate on the streets of our towns and cities. They have done nothing whilst paedophiles prey on our young children, leaving every parent a feeling of despair and desperation. The family unit has crumbled, with the apparent support of the state. Children are growing up without any `Male` role models except the images broadcast into their living rooms by the purveyors of evil in Hollywood and closer to home. In other word, while paying `lip service` to law and order, it seems to me now that it is the British State which not only stood idly by whilst a once proud and decent nation fell into degeneration, but actively encouraged the `problem`. And with each manufactured problem, the people have demanded a solution. Problem, reaction, Solution. Create the problem, get the people to demand a solution, then give it to them, and then some. People in Britain are tired of the chaos and lawlessness and are demanding something is done. Enter the `Civil Contingencies Act of 2004` by which the government can declare a state of emergency and enforce Martial Law for as long as said emergency exists, and that its at the prerogative of the Prime Minister. In Spirit and detail, this is a copy of the `Nazi Enabling Act` of 1936 and the `US Patriot Act` of 2001. Similar legislation is being introduced across the `Western World`. The EU is watching to see how goes it in the UK. At present, there seems no reason for such measures here in Denmark. The `Silent threat` is enough for the present. The incessant economic turning of the screw is doing it's job well enough for now. But, I just wonder how many turns are left before Danes wake up and `smell the coffee` or should I say `Kaffe`. Philip Jones

________________________________________________________________________________________________




The Debt Trap!

In order to fully understand and appreciate the Global Conspiracy, it is essential for us to understand the background to the World Money System. This is not taught in Schools or Universities, and no `economist` or TV News financial correspondent is going to let you into the secret either. Most of them haven't a clue what is going on, (having been programmed by the `Education` system) and those that do know, want to keep it to themselves. The foundations of the manipulation towards a world government, army, bank and currency are built on the fantastic `con trick` we call the banking system. Once we understand how this works, then it becomes easy to appreciate how a few people can control the lives of everyone on this planet. So how does this `scam` work ? The banks are given the power by governments to create `money`, which actually means creating `non existent` money in the form of credit. This costs them nothing, but the moment this credit is brought into `theoretical` existence, the banks can begin charging interest on it. This is the system which directly or indirectly controls everyone's life. But it goes further. When you go to a bank for a loan, the bank creates credit to the size of that loan, 600.000, 00 DKK for example. This, if only in theory is `new money`. But not only are you going to need to pay back the `loaned` amount, but also the interest on that amount. This `interest` is not created by the bank, but it still has to be found from somewhere. So where from ? From the wealth and credit already circulating in the world. In your case, from the `money` you either earn, or from `money` you gain by selling your possessions etc. In this way, the real wealth of the planet is sucked into the banking system in the form of the interest paid on every loan made to every person, business and government. This insanity has allowed banks to lend even more `non existent` money and get the world even deeper in debt. The wealth and credit loaning capacity the `Central Bankers` have accumulated is beyond imagination. It far exceeds the supposed wealth of, for example the United States. The so called `Richest Country` in the world. In fact they own the US as they do almost every country on earth. The Bankers have used this wealth and credit, to buy and control the Global Oil Companies, Multinational Corporations of every kind, the Media, Armament Companies, Pharmaceutical Companies, Politicians and their `advisors`, and more or less everything else they need to control the world. The same few people own it all. They hide this behind `front` organisations, phoney companies and puppet `directors`, and are aided in their desire for secrecy by an owned and compliant media and a `bought and paid for` deviant `Education` system. The Rothschild's and Rockefellers alone, own and control a huge network of banks, oil companies, multinational corporations, media organisations, airlines and much more. It is said that the Rockefeller's ability to hide the extent of their power is phenomenal, but the Rothschild's borders on genius. The Rothschild's are not in the `big league`, financially speaking, they are the `big league`. This covert intertwining of power in banking, politics and the media allows the same few people to promote the same policy throughout an array of apparently unconnected institutions and organisations. Now we come to the `Crunch`, the nuts and bolts as it were. By controlling the creation of credit, the bankers can create `Boom and Bust` throughout the world's economy, whether it be nationally, or internationally. An economic depression is NOT caused by a decrease or collapse in demand for goods and services (as the `economic experts` tell us). People do not decide that suddenly, they no longer want jobs done, or articles produced. An economic crisis is caused when there are not enough pieces of paper and electronic `money` in circulation to pay for those goods and services. And it is the bankers who control the amount of money-credit in circulation. They reduce the number of loans they make and increase interest rates. This `reaps` a massive reward for the bankers. The interest on loans taken out before the manipulated economic `collapse` still have to be repaid, and if people default on those repayments, the banks take their property, thereby increasing significantly the amount of `Real Estate` they (the bankers) own. Additionally, with every payment of interest made by those who are able to continue paying their loans, more `money` is taken out of circulation, thus worsening the economic depression. This process of taking `money` out of circulation has been going on for years, even centuries, but is discernible particularly since the beginning of the 20th century. The `Economists` and their `lapdogs`, the Politicians and economic correspondents say it is part of the `Economic Cycle`. RUBBISH !! In the 1930's, the economic depression in which men, women and children starved in their thousands (in a world of plenty) was caused by the banks withdrawing money from circulation by refusing loans. It wasn't that people no longer wanted to eat. They simply could not afford to do so because the `money` had been withdrawn from circulation. Robert H Hemphill, a credit manager at the federal Reserve bank in Atlanta wrote; 'This is a staggering thought. We are completely dependent on the commercial banks. Someone has to borrow every dollar we have, cash or credit. If the banks create ample synthetic money we prosper, if not, we starve. We are absolutely without a permanent money system. When one gets a complete grasp of the picture, the tragic absurdity of our hopeless situation is almost incredible, but there it is. It is the most important subject intelligent persons can investigate and reflect upon. It is so important that our present civilisation may collapse, unless it becomes widely understood and the defects remedied very soon'. We now hear almost every day how the US economy is `collapsing`. This is not part of some `economic cycle`. It is created and intended in order to break down the only country left which could stop the creation of the `One World State`, or `New World Order`. The irony is that the majority of those working towards this goal in the US itself are those who have sworn oaths of loyalty to the very constitution they are working so hard to destroy. Those of you who are not American should not forget that where goes the US economy today, so follows the rest of the world tomorrow. Philip Jones

________________________________________________________________________________________________




Microchipping The Met

As a former Metropolitan Police Officer, it was with great concern that I read yesterday's announcement by Sir Ian Blair, The Police Commissioner of London, that every one of the 31,000 serving officers will be `Microchipped` so that their `movements` can be monitored more effectively. The new device called the `Automated Personal Location System` or APLS will mean that Officers will `never` be out of range of supervisors. This massive invasion of the `last frontier` of human privacy (a person's self) is being sold as a means by which better protection can be afforded patrol units. What nobody, including the Police Federation seems to understand, is that once `embedded` into a person, the potential of this `chip` goes much further than merely being used as a tracking device. The `Personal Microchip` is the Illuminati's `icing on the cake` where social control is concerned, and the key to the global control of the planet's population. If this `mandatory` chipping of London Police Officers goes ahead, the precedent will be set, and how long will it be before the `Armed Forces`, and other `Emergency Services` follow suit ? Furthermore, with the Police already `fitted out` with this new `wonder chip`, it won't be too difficult to `sell` the `APLS` to parents already whipped into a state of `terror` by sensationalised reporting by the Mass Media of every new child abduction case. 'If it's alright for the Police, well it must be a good thing then' ,will be the likely consensus. It is an accepted fact that the UK is the surveillance capitol of the world, and it's people are sleepwalking headlong into a `Big Brother` Totalitarian State, the monstrous proportions of which even George Orwell could not have imagined. As mentioned above, the `tracking` ability of the APLS is only a minor aspect of it's sinister potential for human control. Over the past twenty years or so, Credit and Debit cards have largely replaced cash transactions on the high street. The imminent introduction of the national ID card system in both the UK and US would facilitate the `phasing` out of Credit/Charge cards as personal information and financial details are embedded onto the ID card's `chip`. This in due course would accelerate the disappearance of `cash` altogether. The question begs to be asked; If there's no cash alternative, and the chip in your card has been switched off because you wouldn't `conform` to their new World Order, what are you going to do ? There you have `their` recipe for the complete economic and social enslavement of mankind. This is even more the case with personal microchips, and the with speed technology in this field is now advancing, the introduction of the APLS could literally `leapfrog` over the National ID card, and the trickle of public acquiescence would become an avalanche, as more and more employers insist on their workforce accepting `voluntary` chipping as a precondition of employment. Information stored within the `Chip` could be easily accessed via a Central Computer, and sold to private companies by government agencies. So, they'll decide whether you work or not, and whether you will have the capacity to purchase food and everything else needed to live, or not. The Book of Revelations foretold of these developments long ago, ' And he causeth all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and bond to receive a mark on their foreheads, or upon their right hand. That no man might buy or sell, save he had that mark, or the name of the beast, or the number of his name. Here is wisdom. Let him who hath understanding count the number of the beast, for it is the number of a man, and his number is 666'. The chip placed in the back of your hand will be the mark of the beast. With everyone's complete personal `portfolio` registered on a National database (to be transferred to the Global Computer when the time is right), the dignity of human kind and the concept of the individual will disappear. I recall watching an episode of `Star Trek, The Next Generation` a few years back, and an Alien Race known as the `Borg`. The Borg were part organic, part cyborg, and were all linked to each other via their central computer. Unless we wake up and stop this relentless march towards totalitarianism, there is your picture of the future. In the words of George Orwell, 'If you want to know what the future looks like. Imagine a boot, stamping down onto a human face forever'. The British Police Sevice is a ready made `easy target` for this pernicous and ominous attack on personal liberty, thinly disguised as being a means of safeguarding patrol officers. They have weak representation and no trade union. Unless their members stand firm and refuse this grim proposal, the above scenario becoming a reality is almost inevitable. As CS Lewis put it, 'When the Round Table is broken. Men must choose galahad or Mordred. Middle things are gone. Ref: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/news.html?in_article_id=558597&in_page_id=1770 Philip Jones

________________________________________________________________________________________________




'The Silence Of The lambs' (the true story)

This past weekend, MSN has been running a `Forum ` entitled 'Should the 24 week Abortion Limit be reduced ?' referring to UK guidelines on the time limit up to what point an Abortion may be carried out. This `timescale` has been in effect since 1967. Pro Life campaigners in the UK are saying that owing to medical advances, babies of 24 weeks have a better chance of survival and this upper limit should be reduced. It also publishes a thought provoking statistic; 186,000 `legal` abortions were carried out last year in the UK . In his book` The Death Of The West` Sen. Patrick Buchanan states that between 1973 and 2000, 40 million legal abortions were carried out in the US, and a third of all pregnancies now end up at the `clinic`, making Abortion the most practiced Surgical procedure in the US. I went and made my own contribution to the `forum` whilst it was at a fairy early stage. What shocked me is the arrogance and vehemence of the `Pro Choice `comments. Then there are the `Apologists` for Abortion with remarks like ' Isn't it better for the foetus to be aborted, rather than be born unwanted, or in bad or poor circumstances.' I wonder if they would feel the same if their parents had had the same idea. But then, they wouldn't be here to make such banalities would they. What is evident throughout, is that no matter which way people view this subject, almost none have any grasp of the `Big Picture`. In 1960, People of European stock constituted a quarter of the Earths Population of three billion. By 2000, whilst the World Population doubled, the `Euro Stock` had stopped reproducing. Only Albania in Europe maintained a replacement level birth-rate. Between 2000-2050, the world population is expected to rise to nine billion. This increase will come almost entirely from the developing world, while 100 million people of European decent will die unreplaced. By 2050, Western peoples will make up only 1/10 the world populace and will begin to feel minorities in many of their own cities. This decline has awesome implications for the West. People there will be faced with stark choices; import millions of immigrants to work and pay the taxes needed to support a burgeoning elderly population, or keep on raising taxes, and push back the `retirement` age ever further. Together with the Contraceptive Pill, `Planned Parenthood`, and the almost maniacal promotion of Feminism and Homosexuality throughout all avenues of the media and state education, women in the West have been indoctrinated into believing that a valid life can only be attained via career, and that marriage and motherhood is somehow a poor choice. One of the most staggering factor's in all this is how selfish and callous many women have become. Now, one can almost hear the `Feminazi's` preparing their `Men should step up to the plate and take some responsibility` tirade. But hold on a minute. These are the very same types, who have been encouraging males to `get in touch with their `feminine side` for decades. After being `Nanny'd` much of their lives, is it any wonder that young men today are unable, or at the very least reluctant to take on the burden of a family. More to the point, even if they so desired, where would they find a young woman so inclined. The `Pro Choice` lobby cannot be taken in isolation. It is part of a long running and long term UN coordinated war on population. The contention that the Earth is overpopulated is one of the great `hoaxes` of the past 100 years. Overpopulation is a crucial link in the `One World `agenda, which the UN uses to justify far reaching controls over economy, environment and our reproductive lives. `World Bank` loans are given to `developing` nations on the condition that they partake in `family planning`, and `Third World` country's have suffered greatly from this ideology, along with the economic exploitation of their peoples and natural resources. Convincing women in the west not to have babies has been easy. The full spectrum of the mass media has been coordinated to ensure that the Feminist view is always given the fullest and most positive coverage. In education, films, TV and Popular Music, nowhere is Marriage and Motherhood encouraged. Young women are told `behave just as the boys do`, practice `safe sex`, and if all goes wrong, well there is always the Abortion Clinic. Many women treat their wombs like `trashcans`. They show no regard for themselves, nor the life growing inside them. Then they moan that modern men have no respect for them. Little wonder that the relationship between the men and women has never been more strained. But of course, this is exactly what the`Lords Of Money` want. A strong family, is a `bulwark` against their plans for the world control of sad and isolated people. Divide and rule is an age old song, and the feminists have danced well to it. What will happen to all the Ms' when they have served their purpose, (having largely assisted in the depopulating of our planet, the emasculation of the male, the alienation of millions of young men and women, who will never know how it is to find lifelong love and companionship, and the needless and malevolent slaughter of the innocents growing in the wombs) and find their services `no longer required` when the Draconian State, imposed with their complicity, drags them back into a new `Dark Age`. The saddening aspect in all of this is how effective the whole thing thing has been. Mention Abortion, or marriage or family to the vast majority of women and the almost `robotlike` response is so uniformly predicatable in it's support of the `feminist ideal` expounded by Ms Frieden and Co. Women are of course among the primary victims in this `Scam`, together with those helpless souls who have no voice, nor say as to whether they live or die. Millions of them sentenced to death for the crime of being concieved. Philip Jones

________________________________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________________________